The Organization Research Group

Dhaliwal, R. S. (2022). On Addressability, or What Even Is Computation? Critical Inquiry, 49(1), 1–27. doi:10.1086/721167

Offert, F., & Dhaliwal, R. S. (2024). The Method of Critical AI Studies, A Propaedeutic. ArXiv. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.18833

Offert, F. (2017). Intuition and Epistemology of High-Dimensional Vector Space. Fabian Offert → Blog. Retrieved from https://zentralwerkstatt.squarespace.com/blog/vsm.

Offert, F., Kim, P., & Cai, Q. (2024). Synthesizing Proteins on the Graphics Card. Protein Folding and the Limits of Critical AI Studies. ArXiv. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.09788

Chen, N., Liu, J., Dong, X., Liu, Q., Sakai, T., & Wu, X.-M. (2024). AI Can Be Cognitively Biased: An Exploratory Study on Threshold Priming in LLM-Based Batch Relevance Assessment. ArXiv. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.16022

Voss, G. (2024). Systems Ultra: Making Sense of Technology in a Complex World. New York: Verso.

Voss, G. (2024). Systems Ultra: Making Sense of Technology in a Complex World. New York: Verso.

Hui, A. (2023). Paying attention to the birds: Ornithologists and listening. In D. G. Burnett & J. E. H. Smith (Eds.), Scenes of Attention (pp. 63–80). New York: Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/burn21118

Trace, C., & Hodges, J. (2024). Algorithmic futures: the intersection of algorithms and evidentiary work. Information, Communcation, & Society, 27(7). doi:10.1080/1369118X.2023.2255656

Dobson, J. (2023). Objective Vision: Confusing the Subject of Computer Vision. Social Text, 41(3), 35–55. doi:10.1215/01642472-10613653

Doganova, L. (2024). Discounting the Future: The Ascendancy of a Political Technology. Brooklyn, New York: Zone Books.

Doganova, L. (2024). Discounting the Future: The Ascendancy of a Political Technology. Brooklyn, New York: Zone Books.

Doganova, L. (2024). Discounting the Future: The Ascendancy of a Political Technology. Brooklyn, New York: Zone Books.

Valdivia, A., & Tazzioli, M. (2023). Datafication genealogies beyond algorithmic fairness: Making up racialised subjects. In FAccT ’23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3593013.3594047

Koopman, C. (2024). From Galton’s pride to Du Bois’s pursuit: The formats of data-driven inequality. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(1), 59–78. doi:10.1177/02632764231162251

Pryke, M., & Allen, J. (2000). Monetized time-space: derivatives – money’s ‘new imaginary’? Economy and Society, 29(2), 264–284. doi:10.1080/030851400360497

Vogl, J. (2022). Capital and Ressentiment: A Brief Theory of the Present. Cambridge: Polity.

Vogl, J. (2022). Capital and Ressentiment: A Brief Theory of the Present. Cambridge: Polity.

Tomkins, S. (1963). Simulation of personality: The interrelationships between affect, memory, thinking, perception, and action. In S. Tomkins & S. Messick (Eds.), Computer Simulation of Personality: Frontier of Psychological Theory (pp. 3–57). New York: Wiley.

Frank, A., & Wilson, E. (2020). A Sylvan Tomkins Handbook: Foundations for Affect Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Frank, A., & Wilson, E. (2020). A Sylvan Tomkins Handbook: Foundations for Affect Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Liu, L. H. (2023). After Turing: How philosophy migrated to the AI lab. Critical Inquiry, 50(1), 2–30. doi:10.1086/726293

Lury, C., Day, S., Simon, A., Tironi, M., Valderrama , M., & Wark, S. (2024). Lessons in relevance from the prototyping of a recommendation app. Valuation Studies, 11. doi:10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2024.11.1.38-59

Hind, S., & Seitz, T. (2024). Cynical technical practice: From AI to APIs. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 30(1). doi:10.1177/13548565221133248

Jacobsen, B. (2024). The logic of the synthetic supplement in algorithmic societies. Theory, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/02632764231225768

Becker, C. (2023). Insolvent: How to Reorient Computing for Just Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Becker, C. (2023). Insolvent: How to Reorient Computing for Just Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Becker, C. (2023). Insolvent: How to Reorient Computing for Just Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Possati, L. (2023). Psychoanalyzing artificial intelligence: the case of Replika. AI & Society, 38. doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01379-7

Possati, L. (2023). From Turing to Peirce. A semiotic interpretation of computation. Foundations of Science, 28. doi:10.1007/s10699-022-09878-6

Marin, L., Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2018). Page, text and screen in the university: Revisiting the Illich hypothesis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(1), 49–60. doi:10.1080/00131857.2017.1323624

Ingold, T. (2024). On being tasked with the problem of inhabiting the page. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 13(2). Retrieved from https://social-epistemology.com/2024/02/02/on-being-tasked-with-the-problem-of-inhabiting-the-page-tim-ingold/.

Hayles, N. K. (2024). Detoxifying cybernetics: from homeostasis to autopoiesis and beyond. In Y. Hui (Ed.), Cybernetics for the 21st Century Vol. 1: Epistemological Reconstruction (pp. 85–99). Hanart Press.

Bergson, H. (2023). The cinematographic mechanism of thought and the mechanistic illusion. A glance at the history of systems. Real becoming and false evolutionism. In Creative Evolution (pp. 238–316). Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315537818

Pedwell, C. (2023). Intuition as a “trained thing”: sensing, thinking, and speculating in computational cultures. Subjectivity, 30, 348–372. doi:10.1057/s41286-023-00170-x

Mead, M. (1968). Cybernetics of cybernetics. In H. von Foerster (Ed.), Purposive Systems. New York: Spartan Books.

Krippendorff, K. (2008). Social organizations as reconstitutable networks of conversations. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 15(3–4), 149–161.

Krippendorff, K. (2023). A critical cybernetics. Constructivist Foundations, 19(1), 82–93.

Wooodward, A. (2023). Raymond Ruyer and the Philosophy of Information. In Cybernetics and the Origin of Information (pp. vii–xxiii). London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Teil, G. (2023). Why do experts and amateurs diverge in their tastings? A pragmatic analysis of perception. Theory, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/02632764231203185

Pasquinelli, M. (2023). The Eye of the Master: A Social History of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Verso.

Pasquinelli, M. (2023). The Eye of the Master: A Social History of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Verso.

Pasquinelli, M. (2023). The Eye of the Master: A Social History of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Verso.

Hauser, E. (2023). Facts in the machine: Systems of record and the performance of sociotechnical truth. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.24820

Bricken, T., Templeton, A., Batson, J., Chen, B., & Jermyn, A. (2023). Towards monosemanticity: decomposing language models with dictionary learnin. Transformer Circuits Thread. Retrieved from https://transformer-circuits.pub/2023/monosemantic-features/.

Bates, M. (2018). Concepts for the study of information embodiment. Library Trends, 66(3), 239–266. doi:10.1353/lib.2018.0002

Petras, V. (2023). The identity of information science. Journal of Documentation. doi:10.1108/JD-04-2023-0074

Gal, S. (2016). Scale-Making: Comparison and Perspective as Ideological Projects. In E. S. Carr & M. Lempert (Eds.), Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life (pp. 91–111). Berkeley: University of California Press. doi:10.1525/luminos.15

Day, S., Lury, C., & Ward, H. (2023). Personalization: a new political arithmetic? Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 24(2), 167–194. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2022.2098352

Seaver, N. (2022). Computing Taste: Algorithms and the Makers of Music Recommendation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rieder, B., Gordon, G., & Sileno, G. (2022). Mapping Value(s) in AI: Methodological Directions for Examining Normativity in Complex Technical Systems. Sociologica, 16(3), 51–83. doi:10.6092/issn.1971-8853/15910

Warner, J. (2023). The spectrum of semantic and syntactic labour. Journal of Documentation. doi:10.1108/JD-03-2023-0057

McGuigan, L. (2023). Selling the American People: Advertising, Optimization, and the Origins of Adtech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

McGuigan, L. (2023). Selling the American People: Advertising, Optimization, and the Origins of Adtech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mackenzie, A. (2023). Some-any: approximating personalization in contemporary ensembles. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2023.2185874

McMillan-Major, A., Bender, E. M., & Friedman, B. (2023). Data Statements: From Technical Concept to Community Practice. ACM Journal on Responsible Computing. doi:10.1145/3594737

John-Mathews, J.-M., Cardon, D., & Balagué, C. (2022). From Reality to World. A Critical Perspective on AI Fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(4), 945–959. doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05055-8

John-Mathews, J.-M., & Cardon, D. (2022). The Crisis of Social Categories in the Age of AI. Sociologica, 16(3), 5–16. doi:10.6092/issn.1971-8853/15931

Piantadosi, S., & Hill, F. (2022). Meaning without reference in large language models. In NeurIPS 2022 Workshop on Neuro Causal and Symbolic AI (nCSI). San Diego, CA: Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2208.02957

Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In C.-J. Bailey & R. Shuy (Eds.), New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English (pp. 29–62). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (pp. 325–345). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Stewart, J. (2014). An enquiry concerning the nature of conceptual categories: A case-study on the social dimensions of human cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00654

Smith, D. (1975). The social construction of documentary reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44(4). doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1974.tb01159.x

Poirier, L. (2021). Reading datasets: Strategies for interpreting the politics of data signification. Big Data & Society, 8(2). doi:10.1177/20539517211029322

Wickett, K. M. (2023). Critical data modeling and the basic representation model. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1–11. doi:10.1002/asi.24745

Iliadis, A., Acker, A., Stevens, W., & Kavaklı, S. B. (2023). One schema to rule them all: How Schema.org models the world of search. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1–64. doi:10.1002/asi.24744

Bishop, R. (2022). Bernard Stiegler and the Internation Project: An introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(7–8), 5–17. doi:10.1177/02632764221141804

Serres, M. (2015). Thumbelina: The culture and technology of Millenials. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Barker, T. (2023). Michael Serres and the philosophy of technology. Theory, Culture & Society, 1–16. doi:10.1177/02632764221140825

Ginzburg, C. (2004). Family resemblances and family trees: Two cognitive metaphors. Critical Inquiry, 30(3), 537–556. doi:10.1086/421161

Tatarchenko, K., Yermakova, A., & De Mol, L. (2021). Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part II–Reinterpreting algorithmic rationality. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 43(4), 57–69. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2021.3135714

Tatarchenko, K., Yermakova, A., & De Mol, L. (2021). Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part I–Recovering intelligentsia logics. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 43(4), 43–56. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2021.3126649

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

Button, G., Lynch, M., & Sharrock, W. (2022). Ethnomethodology, conversational analysis and constructive analysis: On formal structures and practical action. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003220794

Button, G., Lynch, M., & Sharrock, W. (2022). Ethnomethodology, conversational analysis and constructive analysis: On formal structures and practical action. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003220794

Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1986). On formal structures of practical actions. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work (pp. 157–189). Abingdon: Routledge.

Roach, R. (2022). Expanding the history of humanities computing: Hugh Kenner’s conversational criticism. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 00, 1–17. doi:10.1093/llc/fqac066

Kockelman, P. (2017). The art of interpretation in the age of computation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190636531.001.0001

Kockelman, P. (2017). The art of interpretation in the age of computation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190636531.001.0001

Kockelman, P. (2017). The art of interpretation in the age of computation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190636531.001.0001

Kockelman, P. (2017). The art of interpretation in the age of computation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190636531.001.0001

Montoya, R. D. (2022). Power of position: Classification and the biodiversity sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/12245.001.0001

Montoya, R. D. (2022). Power of position: Classification and the biodiversity sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/12245.001.0001

Simondon, G. (2016). On the modes of existence of technical objects. Minneapolis: Univocal.

Hong, S. (2022). Predictions without futures. History & Theory, 61(3), 371–390. doi:10.1111/hith.12269

Crooks, R., & Currie, M. (2021). Numbers will not save us: Agonistic data practices. The Information Society, 37(4), 201–213. doi:10.1080/01972243.2021.1920081

Dander, V., & Macgilchrist, F. (2022). School of data and shifting forms of political subjectivity. In P. Bettinger (Ed.), Educational perspectives on mediality and subjectivation (pp. 45–69). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Pivot Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84343-4_3

Gray, J., Gerlitz, C., & Bounegru, L. (2018). Data infrastructure literacy. Big Data & Society, 5(2). doi:10.1177/2053951718786316

de Groat, G. (2015). A history of video game cataloging in U.S. libraries. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(2), 135–156. doi:10.1080/01639374.2014.954297

Brock, A. (2020). Distributed blackness: African American cybercultures. New York: New York University Press. doi:10.18574/nyu/9781479820375.001.0001

Angus, I. (2019). Logic of subsumption, logic of invention: Marx, Marcuse, and Simondon. Philosophy & Technology, 32, 613–625. doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0324-4

Wright, S. (2021). The weight of the printed word: Text, context and miltancy in Operaismo. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004471542

Wright, S. (2021). The weight of the printed word: Text, context and miltancy in Operaismo. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004471542

West, S. M. (2022). Cryptography as information control. Social Studies of Science, 52(3), 353–375. doi:10.1177/03063127221078314

Morozov, E. (2022). Critique of techno feudal reason. New Left Review, 133/134, 89–126.

Apel, K.-O. (1981). Charles Peirce: From Pragmatism to Pragmaticism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Bergman, M. K. (2018). A knowledge representation practionary: Guidelines based on Charles Saunders Peirce. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98092-8

Joque, J. (2022). Revolutionary mathematics: Artificial intelligence, statistics, and the logic of capitalism. New York: Verso.

Tsing, A. L. (2022). The socialty of birds: Reflections on ontological edge effects. In T. van Dooren & M. Chrulew (Eds.), Kin: Thinking with Deborah Bird Rose (pp. 15–32). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9781478022664-002

Koch, M. (2018). Introduction: Non-knowledge and digital cultures. In M. Boden, M. Koch, & M. Leeker (Eds.), Non-knowledge digital cultures (pp. 11–18). Lüneburg, Germany: meson press.

Bernard, A. (2018). The total archive: On the function of non-knowledge in digital cultures. In M. Boden, M. Koch, & M. Leeker (Eds.), Non-knowledge digital cultures (pp. 19–38). Lüneburg, Germany: meson press.

Moor, R. (2016). On trails: An exploration. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Moor, R. (2016). On trails: An exploration. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Ernst, W. (2016). Chronopoetics: The temporal being and operativity of technological media. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Arawjo, I. (2020). In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3313831.3376731

Radio, E., & Kalwara, J. (2021). The trajectory of linked data in late capitalism. Journal of Documentation. doi:10.1108/JD-02-2021-0037

Parisi, L. (2021). Interactive computation and artificial epistemologies. Theory, Culture & Society, 38(7–8), 1–21. doi:10.1177/02632764211048548

Le Guin, U. K. (2020). The carrier bag theory of fiction. London: Ignota Books.

Sofia, Z. (2000). Container technologies. Hypatia, 15(2), 181–201. doi:10.1353/hyp.2000.0029

Vismann, C. (2008). From documents to records. In Files: Law and Media Technology (pp. 71–101). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Vismann, C. (2008). From translating to legislating. In Files: Law and Media Technology (pp. 39–70). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Vismann, C. (2008). Law’s writing lessons. In Files: Law and Media Technology (pp. 1–38). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Viljoen, S. (2020). Democratic Data: A Relational Theory For Data Governance. Yale Law Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3727562

Greene, D. (2021). The promise of access: Technology, inequality, and the political economy of hope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/11674.001.0001

Greene, D. (2021). The promise of access: Technology, inequality, and the political economy of hope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/11674.001.0001

Geiger, R. S., Cope, D., Ip, J., Lotosh, M., Shah, A., Weng, J., & Tang, R. (2021). “Garbage in, garbage out” revisited: What do machine learning application papers report about human-labeled training data? Quantitative Science Studies, 2(2), 1–33. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00144

Young, L. C. (2021). Colonization’s logistical media: The ship and the document. In M. Hockenberry, N. Starosielski, & S. Zieger (Eds.), Assembly codes: The logistics of media (pp. 94–110). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9781478013037-008

Starosielski, N. (2021). The politics of cable supply from the British Empire to Huawei Marine. In M. Hockenberry, N. Starosielski, & S. Zieger (Eds.), Assembly codes: The logistics of media (pp. 190–205). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9781478013037-014

Renn, J. (2020). The evolution of knowledge: Rethinking science for the Anthropocene. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvdf0kpk

Renn, J. (2020). The evolution of knowledge: Rethinking science for the Anthropocene. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvdf0kpk

Renn, J. (2020). The evolution of knowledge: Rethinking science for the Anthropocene. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvdf0kpk

Damerow, P. (1996). Abstraction and representation: Essays on the cultural evolution of thinking. New York: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8624-5

Pasquinelli, M. (2021). How to Make a Class: Hayek’s Neoliberalism and the Origins of Connectionism. Qui Parle, 30(1), 159–184. doi:10.1215/10418385-8955836

Stevens, N., Hoffmann, A. L., & Florini, S. (2021). The unremarked optimum: whiteness, optimization, and control in the database revolution. Review of Communication, 21(2), 113–128. doi:10.1080/15358593.2021.1934521

Hui, Y. (2021). Introduction: Philosophy after automation? Philosophy Today, 65(2), 217–233. doi:10.5840/philtoday2021652392

Plantin, J.-C. (2021). The data archive as factory: Alienation and resistance of data processors. Big Data & Society, 8(1). doi:10.1177/20539517211007510

Pütz, O. (2021). Managing exactness and vagueness in computer science work: Programming and self-repair in meetings. Social Studies of Science. doi:10.1177/03063127211010972

Watson, R., & Carlin, A. P. (2012). ‘Information’: Praxeological considerations. Human Studies, 35, 327–345. doi:10.1007/s10746-012-9233-1

Liu, L. H. (2021). Wittgenstein in the machine. Critical Inquiry, 47(3), 425–455. doi:10.1086/713551

Gabriel, R. P. (2014). In Onward! 2014: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming & Software (pp. 301–319). Piscataway: IEEE. doi:10.1145/2661136.2661155

Garvey, S. C. (2021). The “general problem solver” does not exist: Mortimer Taube and the art of AI criticism. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 43(1), 60–73. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2021.3051686

Adam, A. (1998). Artificial knowing: Gender and the thinking machine. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203005057

D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001

Rheinberger, H.-J. (2010). An epistemology of the concrete: Twentieth-century histories of life. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822391333

Rheinberger, H.-J. (2010). An epistemology of the concrete: Twentieth-century histories of life. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822391333

Ankeny, R., & Leonelli, S. (2020). Model Organisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108593014

Keller, E. F. (2000). The century of the gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Collier, J. (2008). Information in biological systems. In P. Adriaans & J. van Benthem (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 8: Philosophy of Information (pp. 763–787). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-51726-5.50024-8

Ma, Y. (2020). Understanding information: Adding a non‐individualistic lens. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.24441

Cleland, C. E., Hazen, R. M., & Morrison, S. M. (2021). Historical natural kinds and mineralogy: Systematizing contingency in the context of necessity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(1). doi:10.1073/pnas.2015370118

Farstadvoll, S. (2018). Growing Concerns: Plants and Their Roots in the Past. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 2(5), 174–193. doi:10.1558/jca.35117

Brün, H. (2004). Technology and the composer. In A. Chandra (Ed.), When Music Resists Meaning: The Major Writings of Herbert Brün (pp. 163–176). Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.

Brün, H. (2004). For anticommunication. In A. Chandra (Ed.), When Music Resists Meaning: The Major Writings of Herbert Brün (pp. 60–70). Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.

Ebeling, M. F. E. (2016). Healthcare and Big Data: Digital Specters and Phantom Objects. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-50221-6

Siskin, C. (2016). System: The shaping of modern knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Virgil, V. W. (2020). Genealogy of algorithms: Datafication as transvaluation. Le Foucaldien, 6(1). doi:10.16995/lefou.74

Winthrop-Young, G. (2014). The Kultur of cultural techniques: Conceptual inertia and the parasitic materialities of ontologization. Cultural Politics, 10(3), 376–388. doi:10.1215/17432197-2795741

Buneman, P., Cheney, J., Tan, W.-C., & Vansummeren, S. (2008). Curated databases. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems (pp. 1–12). New York: ACM. doi:10.1215/17432197-2795741

Palmer, C. L., Weber, N. M., Muñoz, T., & Renear, A. H. (2013). Foundations of data curation: The pedagogy and practice of “purposeful work” with research data. Archive Journal. Retrieved from https://www.archivejournal.net/essays/foundations-of-data-curation-the-pedagogy-and-practice-of-purposeful-work-with-research-data/.

Thomer, A. K., & Wickett, K. M. (2020). Relational data paradigms: What do we learn by taking the materiality of databases seriously? Big Data & Society, 7(1). doi:10.1177/2053951720934838

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Calzati, S. (2020). Decolonising “data colonialism”: Propositions for investigating the Realpolitik of today’s networked ecology. Television & New Media, 1–16. doi:10.1177/1527476420957267

Thompson, B., Roberts, S. T., & Lupyan, G. (2020). Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment. Nature Human Behavior, (4), 1029–1038. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0924-8

Stawarska, B. (2020). Saussure’s linguistics, structuralism, and phenomenology: The Course in General Linguistics after a century. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the Age of Data. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 5185–5198). Online: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463

Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud ethics: Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9781478009276

Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud ethics: Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9781478009276

Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud ethics: Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9781478009276

Rieder, B. (2020). Engines of order: A mechanology of algorithmic techniques. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv12sdvf1

Rieder, B. (2020). Engines of order: A mechanology of algorithmic techniques. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv12sdvf1

Rieder, B. (2020). Engines of order: A mechanology of algorithmic techniques. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv12sdvf1

Finn, M., Rosner, D. K., Black, S., Cunningham, N., Dew, K. N., Hoy, J., … Morgan, C. (2020). Troubled worlds: A course syllabus about information work and the Anthropocene. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 3(1). doi:10.24242/jclis.v3i1.137

Koopman, C. (2019). How we became our data: A genealogy of the informational person. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226626611.001.0001

Koopman, C. (2019). How we became our data: A genealogy of the informational person. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226626611.001.0001

Gilbert, J. (2014). Common ground: Democracy and collectivity in an age of individualism. London: Pluto Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt183p7m6

Gilbert, J. (2014). Common ground: Democracy and collectivity in an age of individualism. London: Pluto Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt183p7m6

Bucher, T. (2020). Nothing to disconnect from? Being singular plural in an age of machine learning. Media, Culture & Society, 42(4). doi:10.1177/0163443720914028

Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Polt, R. (2019). Time and trauma: Thinking through Heidegger in the thirties. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Polt, R. (2019). Time and trauma: Thinking through Heidegger in the thirties. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Ullman, E. (2010). Close to the machine: Technophilia and its discontents. San Francisco: City Lights.

Stevenson, M., & Helmond, A. (2020). Legacy systems: Internet histories of the abandoned, discontinued and forgotten. Internet Histories, 4(1). doi:10.1080/24701475.2020.1725854

Mirowski, P., & Nik-Khah, E. (2017). The knowledge we have lost in information: The history of information in modern economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Roth, A. (2015). Who gets what and why: The new economics of matchmaking and market design. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Lash, S., Dragos, B., & Mirowski, P. (2016). An interview with Philip Mirowski. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(6), 123–140. doi:10.1177/0263276415623063

Escobar, A. (2018). Design for Transitions. In Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822371816-006

Escobar, A. (2018). Autonomous Design and the Politics of Relationality and the Communal. In Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822371816-007

Escobar, A. (2018). Introduction. In Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822371816-001

Escobar, A. (2018). In the Background of Our Culture: Rationalism, Ontological Dualism, and Relationality. In Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822371816-004

Hui, Y. (2019). Organizing Inorganic. In Recursivity and Contingency. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Rieder, B., Matamoros Fernández, A., & Coromina, Ò. (2018). From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’: Investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 24(1), 50–68. doi:10.1177/1354856517736982

Anderson, P., Chartier, T., & Langville, A. (2019). The rankability of data. SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science, 1(1), 643–646. doi:10.1137/18M1183595

Garfinkel, H. (2008). Toward a Sociological Theory of Information. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

Orr, J. (1996). Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Canguilhem, G. (2010). Knowledge of Life. New York: Fordham University Press.

Sack, W. (2019). The Software Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sack, W. (2019). The Software Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Morozov, E. (2019). Digital Socialism? The Calculation Debate in the Age of Big Data. New Left Review, (116/117). Retrieved from https://newleftreview.org/issues/II116/articles/evgeny-morozov-digital-socialism.

Amoore, L., & Piotukh, V. (2015). Life beyond big data: governing with little analytics. Economy and Society, 44(3), 341–366. doi:10.1080/03085147.2015.1043793

Lyman, P. (1995). What is computer literacy and what is its place in liberal education? Liberal Education, 81(3), 4–15.

Mackenzie, A. (2018). Personalization and probabilities: Impersonal propensities in online grocery shopping. Big Data & Society, 1–15. doi:10.1177/2053951718778310

Katai, O., Minamizono, K., Shiose, T., & Kawakami, H. (2007). System design of ‘“Ba”’-like stages for improvisational acts via Leibnizian space–time and Peirce’s existential graph concepts. AI & Society, 22(2), 101–112. doi:10.1007/s00146-007-0125-2

Iliadis, A. (2019). The Tower of Babel Problem: Making Data Make Sense with Basic Formal Ontology. Online Information Review. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3326315

Shaw, R. (2019). The Missing Profession: Toward an Institution of Critical Technical Practice. In Proceedings of CoLIS: 10th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science. Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Ribes, D. (2019). STS, Meet Data Science, Once Again. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(3), 514–539. doi:10.1177/0162243918798899

Mackenzie, A. (2002). Transductions: Bodies and Machines at Speed. London: Continuum.

Styhre, A. (2010). The Concept Of Transduction And Its Use In Organization Studies. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 12(3), 115–131.

Oyama, S. (2000). The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Iliadis, A. (2013). Informational Ontology: The Meaning of Gilbert Simondon’s Concept of Individuation. Communication +1, 2(1). doi:10.7275/R59884XW

Keyes, O., Hoy, J., & Drouhard, M. (2019). Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300569

Lury, C., & Wakeford, N. (Eds.). (2014). Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Abingdon: Routledge.

Grimmelmann, J. (2019). All Smart Contracts Are Ambiguous. Penn Journal of Law and Innovation. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3315703.

von Foerster, H., & Poerksen, B. (2002). Perspectives in Practice. In Understanding Systems: Conversations on Epistemology and Ethics (pp. 65–100). New York: Kluwer Academic.

von Foerster, H., & Poerksen, B. (2002). Cybernetics. In Understanding Systems: Conversations on Epistemology and Ethics (pp. 101–116). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Clarke, B., & Hansen, M. B. N. (2009). Introduction: Neocybernetic Emergence. In B. Clarke & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Emergence and Embodiment: New Essays on Second-Order Systems Theory (pp. 1–25). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822391388-001

Clarke, B. (2009). Heinz von Foerster’s Demons: The Emergence of Second-Order Systems Theory. In B. Clarke & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Emergence and Embodiment: New Essays on Second-Order Systems Theory (pp. 34–61). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822391388-003

Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds and collective activity. In Art Worlds (pp. 1–39). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Spencer-Brown, G. (1969). Laws of Form. London: Allen & Unwin.

von Foerster, H., & Poerksen, B. (2002). Images of Reality. In Understanding Systems: Conversations on Epistemology and Ethics (pp. 17–63). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Clarke, B., & Hansen, M. B. N. (2009). Introduction: Neocybernetic Emergence. In B. Clarke & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Emergence and Embodiment: New Essays on Second-Order Systems Theory (pp. 1–25). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822391388-001

Clarke, B. (2009). Heinz von Foerster’s Demons: The Emergence of Second-Order Systems Theory. In B. Clarke & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Emergence and Embodiment: New Essays on Second-Order Systems Theory (pp. 34–61). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822391388-003

Fazi, M. B. (2019). Digital Aesthetics: The Discrete and the Continuous. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(1), 3–26. doi:10.1177/0263276418770243

Bernstein, M. (2018). Links: Exercises In Style. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Studies (pp. 5–11). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3240431.3240433

Lee, D., Robinson, L., & Bawden, D. (2018). Modeling the relationship between scientific and bibliographic classification for music. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(3). doi:10.1002/asi.24120

De Marco, M., & Sorrentino, M. (2007). Sowing the seeds of IS cultivation in public service organisations. Journal of Information Technology, 22(2), 184–194. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000070

Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. Abingdon: Routledge.

McLuhan, M., Papanek, V. J., Bessinger, J. B., Polanyi, K., Hollis, C. C., Hogg, D., & Jones, J. (1967). Verbi-voco-visual Explorations. New York: Something Else Press.

Stoler, A. L. (2009). Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Fletcher-Watson, S., De Jaegher, H., van Dijk, J., Frauenberger, C., Magnée, M., & Ye, J. (2018). Diversity Computing. Interactions, 25(5), 28–33. doi:10.1145/3243461

Let Us Become Radio Mechanics. (2002). In Engineers of Happy Land: Technology and Nationalism in a Colony (pp. 161–192). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Language as Asphalt. (2002). In Engineers of Happy Land: Technology and Nationalism in a Colony (pp. 1–42). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Law, J., & Lien, M. E. (2013). Slippery: Field notes in empirical ontology. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 363–378. doi:10.1177/0306312712456947

Thomas, N. (2018). Becoming-Social in a Networked Age. Abingdon: Routledge.

Grossberg, L., & Behrenshausen, B. (2016). Cultural Studies and Deleuze-Guattari, Part 2: From Affect to Conjunctures. Cultural Studies, 30(6), 1001–1028. doi:10.1080/09502386.2016.1173476

Thomas, N. (2018). Becoming-Social in a Networked Age. Abingdon: Routledge.

Thomas, N. (2018). Becoming-Social in a Networked Age. Abingdon: Routledge.

Smith, D. W. (2011). Deleuze and the Question of Desire: Towards an Immanent Theory of Ethics. In N. Jun & D. W. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze and Ethics (pp. 123–140). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748641178.001.0001

Thomas, N. (2018). Becoming-Social in a Networked Age. Abingdon: Routledge.

Thomas, N. (2018). Becoming-Social in a Networked Age. Abingdon: Routledge.

Ribes, D. (2017). Notes on the Concept of Data Interoperability: Cases from an Ecology of AIDS Research Infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2998181.2998344

Benardou, A., Champion, E., Dallas, C., & Hughes, L. M. (2017). Introduction: a critique of digital practices and research infrastructures. In A. Benardou, E. Champion, C. Dallas, & L. M. Hughes (Eds.), Cultural Heritage Infrastructures in Digital Humanities (pp. 1–14). Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315575278

Stevenson, M. (2016). Rethinking the participatory web: A history of HotWired’s “new publishing paradigm,” 1994–1997. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1331–1346. doi:10.1177/1461444814555950

Irani, L. (2018). “Design Thinking”: Defending Silicon Valley at the Apex of Global Labor Hierarchies. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 4(1), 1–19. doi:10.28968/cftt.v4i1.243

Salter, C. (2015). Alien agency: experimental encounters with art in the making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mackenzie, A. (2017). Machine learners: archaeology of a data practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Packer, B., Halpern, Y., Guajardo-Céspedes, M., & Mitchell, M. (2018). Text embedding models contain bias. Here’s why that matters. Google Developers Blog. Retrieved from https://developers.googleblog.com/2018/04/text-embedding-models-contain-bias.html.

Tennis, J. T. (2013). Ethos and ideology of knowledge organization: toward precepts for an engaged knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 40(1), 42–49. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1773/37978.

van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communcation, & Society, 20(6), 898–914. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.

Noble, S. U., & Roberts, S. T. (2017). Out of the Black Box. Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/3/out-of-the-black-box.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.

Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Waldstein, M. (2008). The Mangle of Practice or the Empire of Signs: Toward a Dialogue between Science Studies and Soviet Semiotics. In A. Pickering & K. Guzik (Eds.), The Mangle in Practice: Science, Society, and Becoming. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822390107-010

Harris, D. R. (2015). Modeling Reusable and Interoperable Faceted Browsing Systems with Category Theory. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (pp. 388–395). Piscataway: IEEE. doi:10.1109/IRI.2015.65

Naur, P. (1992). Computing, a human activity. New York: ACM.

Russell, A. L. (2014). Open standards and the digital age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139856553

Miles, A. (2001). Hypertext structure as the evenyt of connection. In Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM conference on Hypertext (pp. 61–68). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/504216.504236

Gorichanaz, T., & Latham, K. F. (2016). Document phenomenology: a framework for holistic analysis. Journal of Documentation, 72(6), 1114–1133. doi:10.1108/JD-01-2016-0007

Bratton, B. H. (2016). The stack: On software and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262029575.001.0001

Alcoff, L. M. (1997). Immanent  Truth. Science in Context, 10(1), 97–112. doi:10.1017/S0269889700002556

Lynch, C. (2017). Stewardship in the “Age of Algorithms.” First Monday, 22(12). doi:10.5210/fm.v22i12.8097

Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400873548

Simmel, G. (2015). On Art Exhibitions. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(1), 87–92. doi:10.1177/0263276414531052

Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. (K. H. Wolff, Ed.). Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.

Dörk, M., Comber, R., & Dade-Robertson, M. (2014). Monadic exploration: seeing the whole through its parts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14) (pp. 1535–1544). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557083

Sack, W. (2000). Conversation Map: An Interface for Very Large-Scale Conversations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 73–92. doi:10.1080/07421222.2000.11045652

Bowers, J. M. (1991). The Janus Faces of Design: Some Critical Questions for CSCW. In J. M. Bowers & S. D. Benford (Eds.), Studies in computer supported cooperative work (pp. 333–350). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.

Healy, K. (2017). Fuck Nuance. Sociological Theory, 35(2), 118–127. doi:10.1177/0735275117709046

Losee, R. (2015). Thesaurus structure, descriptive parameters, and scale. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2156–2165. doi:10.1002/asi.23544

Levine, C. (2015). Forms: Whole, rhythm, hierarchy, network. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2016). Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12180

Wittkower, D. E. (2016). Principles of anti-discriminatory design. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS 2016). Piscataway: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ETHICS.2016.7560055

Gibson, J. J. (2015). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9781315740218

Bernstein, M., Bolter, J. D., Joyce, M., & Mylonas, E. (1991). Architectures for volatile hypertext. In Proceedings of the third annual ACM conference on Hypertext (pp. 243–260). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/122974.122999

Boland, R. J., Jr., & Lyytinen, K. (2017). The limits to language in doing systems design. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(3), 248–259. doi:10.1057/s41303-017-0043-4

Emerson, L. (2014). Reading writing interfaces: From the digital to the bookbound. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Daston, L. (2017). Algorithms before computers: Patterns, recipes, and rules [Video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqoSMWnWTwA.

Tenen, D. (2017). Plain text: The poetics of computation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Siegert, B. (2014). Cultural techniques: Grids, filters, doors, and other articulations of the real. New York: Fordham University Press.

Siegert, B. (2014). Cultural techniques: Grids, filters, doors, and other articulations of the real. New York: Fordham University Press.

Abbate, J. (2017). What and where is the Internet? (Re)defining Internet histories. Internet Histories, 1(1–2), 8–14. doi:10.1080/24701475.2017.1305836

Turner, F. (2017). Can we write a cultural history of the Internet? If so, how? Internet Histories, 1(1–2), 39–46. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24701475.2017.1307540.

Nofre, D., Priestley, M., & Alberts, G. (2014). When Technology Became Language: The Origins of the Linguistic Conception of Computer Programming, 1950–1960. Technology and Culture, 55(1). doi:10.1353/tech.2014.0031

Ciborra, C. (2004). The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275267.001.0001

Ciborra, C. (2004). The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275267.001.0001

Dreyfus, H. L. (2007). Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1137–1160. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.012

Flynn, P. (1997). W[h]ither the web? The extension or replacement of HTML. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(7), 614–621. doi:10.1002(SICI)1097-4571(199707)48:7#60;614:AID-ASI8#62;3.0.CO;2-W

Stenner, P. (2016). On standards and values: Between finite actuality and infinite possibility. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 144–162. doi:10.1177/0959354316630619

Dennett, D., & Cantwell Smith, B. (2002). Brian Cantwell Smith on evolution, objectivity, and intentionality. In H. Clapin (Ed.), Philosophy of Mental Representation (pp. 222–292). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bratus, S., Locasto, M. E., Patterson, M. L., Sassaman, L., & Shubina, A. (2011). Exploit Programming: From Buffer Overflows to “Weird Machines” and Theory of Computation. ;;Login: The USENIX Magazine, 36(6). Retrieved from https://www.usenix.org/publications/login/december-2011-volume-36-number-6/exploit-programming-buffer-overflows-weird.

Hayles, N. K. (2016). Cognitive Assemblages: Technical Agency and Human Interactions. Critical Inquiry, 43(1), 32–55. doi:10.1086/688293

Passi, S., & Jackson, S. (2017). Data Vision: Learning to See Through Algorithmic Abstraction. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 2436–2447). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2998181.2998331

Smith, B. H. (2016). What Was “Close Reading”? A Century of Method in Literary Studies. The Minnesota Review, 2016(87), 57–75. doi:10.1215/00265667-3630844

Feinberg, M. (2017). Reading databases: slow information interactions beyond the retrieval paradigm. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 336–356. doi:10.1108/JD-03-2016-0030

Cope, J. (2017). Four Theses for Critical Library and Information Studies: A Manifesto. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(1). doi:10.24242/jclis.v1i1.30

Gorichanaz, T. (2017). Minting the Obverse: Library and Information Studies as a One-Sided Coin. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(1). doi:10.24242/jclis.v1i1.7

Robles-Anderson, E., & Svensson, P. (2016). “One damn slide after another”: PowerPoint at every occasion for speech. Computational Culture, 1(5).

Holmes, B. (2002). The flexible personality: For a new cultural critique. Transversals. Retrieved from http://eipcp.net/transversal/1106/holmes/en.

Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.

Freeman, J. (2013). The Tyranny of Structurelessness. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 231–246. doi:10.1353/wsq.2013.0072

Spade, D. (2013). Being Together, After Nonprofitization. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 247–252. doi:10.1353/wsq.2013.0077

Báez, J. (2013). Structurelessness 2.0. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 253–256. doi:10.1353/wsq.2013.0082

Moore, D. L. (2013). Structurelessness, Structure, and Queer Movements. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 257–260. doi:10.1353/wsq.2013.0087

Agre, P. E. (1994). Surveillance and capture: Two models of privacy. The Information Society, 10(2), 101–127. doi:10.1080/01972243.1994.9960162

Mai, J.-E. (2016). Big data privacy: The datafication of personal information. The Information Society, 32(3), 192–199. doi:10.1080/01972243.2016.1153010

Winograd, T. (1987). A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. Human Computer Interaction, 3(1), 3–30. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0301_2

Suchman, L. (1993). Do categories have politics? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2(3), 177–190. doi:10.1007/BF00749015

Winograd, T. (1993). Categories, disciplines, and social coordination. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2(3), 191–197. doi:10.1007/BF00749016

Agre, P. E. (1994). Accountability and discipline: A comment on Suchman and Winograd. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 3(1), 31–35. doi:10.1007/BF01305840

Button, G. (1994). What’s wrong with speech-act theory. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 3(1), 39–42. doi:10.1007/BF01305842

Randall, D. W. (1994). A comment on Lucy Suchman’s “Do categories have politics?” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 3(1), 47–50. doi:10.1007/BF01305844

Curtis, B. (1994). Can speech acts walk the talk? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 3(1), 61–64. doi:10.1007/BF01305847

Lynch, M. (1994). On making explicit. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 3(1), 65–68. doi:10.1007/BF01305848

Bogen, D. (1994). “Do Winograd and Flores have politics?” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 3(1), 79–83. doi:10.1007/BF01305851

Suchman, L. (1994). Speech acts and voices: Response to Winograd et al. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 3(1), 85–95. doi:10.1007/BF01305852

Genosko, G. (2008). A-signifying semiotics. Public Journal of Semiotics, 2(1). Retrieved from http://journals.lub.lu.se/ojs/index.php/pjos/article/view/8822.

Marcus, S., Love, H., & Best, S. (2016). Building a Better Description. Representations, 135(1), 1–21. doi:10.1525/rep.2016.135.1.1

Parikka, J. (2015). A Geology of Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. doi:10.5749/minnesota/9780816695515.001.0001

Haraway, D. (2016). Tentacular Thinking: Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene. E-Flux, 75. Retrieved from http://www.e-flux.com/journal/75/67125/tentacular-thinking-anthropocene-capitalocene-chthulucene/.

Hui, Y. (2016). On the Existence of Digital Objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. doi:10.5749/minnesota/9780816695515.001.0001

Kreiss, D., Finn, M., & Turner, F. (2011). The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the network society. New Media & Society, 13(2), 243–259. doi:10.1177/1461444810370951

Verhoeven, D. (2014). Doing the sheep good: facilitating engagement in digital humanities and creative arts research. Advancing Digital Humanities: Research, Methods, Theories, 206–220. Retrieved from http://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30070005.

Furner, J. (2016). “Data”: The data. In M. Kelly & J. Bielby (Eds.), Information Cultures in the Digital Age (pp. 287–306). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_17

Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2016). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444816661553

Rouvroy, A. (2011). Technology, virtuality and utopia: Governmentality in an age of autonomic computing. In M. Hildebrandt & A. Rouvroy (Eds.), Law, human agency and autonomic computing: the philosophy of law meets the philosophy of technology. Abingdon: Routledge.

Chun, W. H. K. (2016). Big Data as Drama. ELH, 83(2), 363–382. doi:10.1353/elh.2016.0011

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321

Leahu, L. (2016). Ontological Surprises: A Relational Perspective on Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 182–186). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2901790.2901840

Medina, E. (2011). Introduction: Political and Technological Visions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Feenberg, A. (2015). Lukács’s Theory of Reification and Contemporary Social Movements. Rethinking Marxism, 27(4), 490–507. doi:10.1080/08935696.2015.1076968

Shavit, A., & Griesemer, J. R. (2011). Transforming objects into data: how minute technicalities of recording “species location” entrench a basic challenge for biodiversity. In M. Carrier & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Science in the context of application: Methodological change, conceptual transformation, cultural reorientation. Dordrecht: Springer.

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001

Griesemer, J. R. (2015). Sharing Spaces, Crossing Boundaries. In G. C. Bowker, S. Timmermans, A. E. Clarke, & E. Balka (Eds.), Boundary objects and beyond: working with Leigh Star (pp. 201–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Galey, A., & Ruecker, S. (2010). How a prototype argues. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(4), 405–424. doi:10.1093/llc/fqq021

Rieder, B. (2017). Scrutinizing an algorithmic technique: the Bayes classifier as interested reading of reality. Information, Communcation, & Society, 20(1), 100–117. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1181195

Monteiro, E., Pollock, N., Hanseth, O., & Williams, R. (2012). From Artefacts to Infrastructures. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 22(4–6), 575–607. doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9167-1

Fidler, B., & Acker, A. (2017). Metadata, infrastructure, and computer-mediated communication in historical perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2), 412–422. doi:10.1002/asi.23660

Geiger, R. S., & Ribes, D. (2011). Trace Ethnography: Following Coordination through Documentary Practices. In Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.455

Fairthorne, R. A. (1974). Temporal structure in bibliographic classification. In Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge: Proceedings of the Ottawa Conference on the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge (pp. 404–415). Pullach, Germany: Verlag Dokumentation.

Star, S. L. (1995). The Politics of Formal Representation: Wizards, Gurus, and Organizational Complexity. In S. L. Star (Ed.), Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology (pp. 88–118). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Wobbrock, J. O., Ko, A. J., & Kientz, J. A. (2009). Reflections on the Future of iSchools from Inspired Junior Faculty. Interactions, 16(5), 69–71. doi:10.1145/1572626.1572641

Blair, A. (2004). Note Taking as an Art of Transmission. Critical Inquiry, 31(1), 85–107. doi:10.1086/427303

Acker, A. (2015). Toward a Hermeneutics of Data. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 37(3), 70–75. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2015.68

Day, R. E. (2014). Indexing It All: The Subject in the Age of Documentation, Information, and Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Latour, B., Jensen, P., Venturini, T., Grauwin, S., & Boullier, D. (2012). ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ – a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. The British Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 590–615. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x

Clark, A. (2016). Happy Couplings: Emergence and Explanatory Interlock. In M. Kelly & J. Bielby (Eds.), Information Cultures in the Digital Age (pp. 262–281). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Hjørland, B. (2015). Classical databases and knowledge organization: A case for boolean retrieval and human decision-making during searches. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(8), 1559–1575. doi:10.1002/asi.23250